CHAPTER TWO
PRE-ISLAMIC
PRIESTHOOD IN ARABIA AMONG
the nomadic Semites there was no developed priesthood. With the beginning of a
settled state, however, the local sanctuaries (bethels) rose in importance
and at these shrines there was not only sacrifice but an oracle and a priest. The Canaanite-Phoenician
name for priest is, in fact, identical with the Arabic kahin, a soothsayer
(Hebrew, priest). According to Wellhausen, the early Arabian kahins, or
priests, not only were custodians of the sanctuaries, e.g., at Mecca, but gave
out oracles in rhymed prose similar to the short chapters of the Koran. The kahins
were soothsayers; they gave imprecations and benedictions; they alone offered
special prayers for rain (istisqa) with peculiar ritual; their garments
and saliva had healing power; their hair was sacred and potent. In all these respects
Mohammed, even during his lifetime,
was a kahin (priest) as well as prophet. It was he who took the pagan-sacrificial
ritual of Mecca and made it the central feast of Islam. This was the act of a
kahin. After giving a list of these pre-Islamic kahins (priests),
Wellhausen goes on to show at some length that Mohammed himself unwillingly followed
in their footsteps: Mohammad wollte zwar kein Kahin sein konnte aber doch
nicht von ihrer Art lassen6." He
would not be a kahin but could not forsake their art.
The Kaa'ba at Mecca was a very ancient Arab shrine - a bethel. It was in
fact called Bait Allah, God's house, before Mohammed's day, even as Mohammed's father bore the name
of Abd-Allah. And this shrine, although it contained idols and had pagan worship,
was the center of pilgrimage for distant tribes. It had its guardians; it was
covered with a curtain or robe, kiswah, like the Tabernacle in the wilderness
long before Mohammed's time. The Dutch scholar,
R. Dozy, discovered a Hebrew inscription in the interior of the Kaa'ba and wrote
a thesis on "the Jews at Mecca from the days of the Captivity" (Leyden 1864) (cf.
Hughes' Dictionary of Islam articles on Kaa'ba and Kiswah).
So we cannot help concluding that Mohammed knew pagan priests (kahins),
Jewish priests or rabbis, and Christian monks and clergy. It would be strange
if his own mind and his religion did not take some color from these three sources
when he proclaimed himself the Apostle of Allah. That apostleship included many
elements common to the religious leaders of the pagan Arabs and of his Jewish
and Christian neighbors.*
*Dr. Aubrey R. Johnson,
in his book The Cultic Prophet in Ancient Israel, discusses the place and
function of the prophet (nabi) as a cultic specialist in Old Israel, and
contrasts his functions with those of other cultic specialists, the priest (kohen),
the seer (both the ro'eh and the chozeh). He says, "The prophets were part of
the personnel of the shrine, whether local or at Jerusalem. They took their part
in divination, and were consulted, even as late as the time of Jeremiah, for the
sake of securing the welfare of individuals and of nations alike."
So far as "the idea of priesthood being abhorrent to Islam," Mohammed met Christian monks
and priests (ruhban, kissis, ahbar) and received from them directly or
indirectly some of his "revelations" (Tor Andrae and Margoliouth). In the Koran
there is a beautiful tribute to them and it is the only reference to the Christian
clergy of his day: "Thou wilt find the nearest in love to those who believe to
be those who say, We are Christians; that is because there are among them priests
and monks, and because they are not proud" (Surah 5:85; and compare the comment
of Zamakhshari, Vol.1, p.262). Wensinck says that the title rahib was given
to various pious individuals in the earliest history of Islam, and Goldziher tells
of one, Abu Bekr al-Mahzumi, who had the title, rahib- Quraish - the Quraishite
monk-because of his constant devotions (II:394).
The pre-Islamic poets refer to the rahibs' hospitality and tell of their
candlelight which guides the wayfarer by night. There is, it is true, a late and
unorthodox tradition, "La rahbaniya fi'l Islam" - There is no monasticism
in Islam. But this does not occur in the canonical collections. And Surah 57:27,
which speaks of monasticism, should read, according to the older exegesis and
context: "We put in the hearts of those who followed Jesus, compassion and mercy
and the monastic state. They instituted the same only out of a desire to please
God, etc." (So Massignon, in the article Rahbaniya, Ency. of Islam.) "This
older exegesis calls monasticism a divine institution; the younger one expresses
a feeling hosthe to monasticism and coined the tradition, no rahbaniya
in Islam" (idem).
And it is the older exegesis of tradition and the Koran itself which reflects
Mohammed's attitude toward priests
and monks. Early Christianity was far stronger in Arabia when Mohammed appeared on the scene
than is realized. Wellhausen states "that had not Islam entered, in a brief period
all of northern Arabia from the Red Sea to the Persian Gulf would have become
nominally Christian." There were Arab Christian poets even in Mecca. "There was
a superficial knowledge of Christian institutions, rites, and dogma as well as
of legends and biblical stories. These were brought to Mecca by Christian traders
from Abyssinia, Yemen, Syria, and Iraq7."
Now in
such an environment and under such conditions the borrower is servant to the lender.
Mohammed himself borrowed Koran
material from his Christian and Jewish neighbors. The researches of Goldziher,
Caetani, and Lammens only emphasize the fact pointed out by Horowitz that "The
prophet had to enter into the heritage of his predecessors and wrap himself round
with their mantle of saintship. His erstwhile heathen countrymen transferred to
him the powers which they had formerly ascribed to their kahins; the new
converts from the old (Christian) civilizations assigned to him the attributes
of their former saints" (The Moslem World, Vol.12:312). Such were the swaddling-clothes
of the new religion. As for Mohammed himself, Michel d'Herbigny
has thrown new light on his career in a remarkable study, L'Islam Naissant;
Notes Psychologiques (Rome, 1929). How even
the doctrine of vicarious sacrifice, rejected in the Koran, became the chief corner-stone
of popular Islam in Persia is told by William A. Shedd and S. G. Wilson8.
The blood of Hussain at Kerbela took the place of the ancient Kaa'ba blood of
sheep and camel; to atone for sin, at the annual festival. And we shall see later
that there are various sacrifices and blood-covenants in Islam which have Jewish
and Christian features altho they may go back to Arabian pagan sacrifices as primary
source. Here again Islam is a threefold cord not easily broken" into its diversely
colored strands. FOOTNOTES 6
Reste Arabischen Heidentrims. Berlin, 1897, pp. 137-140. Cf. Reste Arabischen
Heidentums. Berlin, 1897, pp. 137-140. Cf. also Ignatz Goldizher, Muhummedanische
Studien, Vol.I, pp.237-260. The facts he cites are a remarkable commentary
on this statement of Wellhausen. At any rate priest (kahin) and (nabi) prophet
were closely related. One is reminded of the lines in Milton's sonnet: "New presbyter
is but old priest writ large." 7
Wellhausen, pp.230-235. Go
To The Next Chapter
Heirs
of the Prophets Table of Contents |